↓ Skip to main content

An epigenetic clock for gestational age at birth based on blood methylation data

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Biology, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
16 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
204 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
267 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An epigenetic clock for gestational age at birth based on blood methylation data
Published in
Genome Biology, October 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13059-016-1068-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anna K. Knight, Jeffrey M. Craig, Christiane Theda, Marie Bækvad-Hansen, Jonas Bybjerg-Grauholm, Christine S. Hansen, Mads V. Hollegaard, David M. Hougaard, Preben B. Mortensen, Shantel M. Weinsheimer, Thomas M. Werge, Patricia A. Brennan, Joseph F. Cubells, D. Jeffrey Newport, Zachary N. Stowe, Jeanie L. Y. Cheong, Philippa Dalach, Lex W. Doyle, Yuk J. Loke, Andrea A. Baccarelli, Allan C. Just, Robert O. Wright, Mara M. Téllez-Rojo, Katherine Svensson, Letizia Trevisi, Elizabeth M. Kennedy, Elisabeth B. Binder, Stella Iurato, Darina Czamara, Katri Räikkönen, Jari M. T. Lahti, Anu-Katriina Pesonen, Eero Kajantie, Pia M. Villa, Hannele Laivuori, Esa Hämäläinen, Hea Jin Park, Lynn B. Bailey, Sasha E. Parets, Varun Kilaru, Ramkumar Menon, Steve Horvath, Nicole R. Bush, Kaja Z. LeWinn, Frances A. Tylavsky, Karen N. Conneely, Alicia K. Smith

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 267 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Finland 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 264 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 56 21%
Researcher 54 20%
Student > Master 25 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 6%
Student > Bachelor 16 6%
Other 46 17%
Unknown 53 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 53 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 44 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 40 15%
Neuroscience 13 5%
Psychology 8 3%
Other 41 15%
Unknown 68 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 66. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2021.
All research outputs
#659,732
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#410
of 4,513 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,548
of 330,158 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#13
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,513 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,158 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.