Title |
Effect of the litter layer on runoff and evapotranspiration using the paired watershed method
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Forest Research, October 2016
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10310-016-0542-5 |
Authors |
Mie Gomyo, Koichiro Kuraji |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 34 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 6 | 18% |
Researcher | 6 | 18% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 9% |
Other | 3 | 9% |
Unknown | 8 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 11 | 32% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 29% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 3% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 3% |
Engineering | 1 | 3% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 10 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2016.
All research outputs
#18,473,108
of 22,890,496 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Forest Research
#108
of 142 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#242,049
of 319,862 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Forest Research
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,890,496 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 142 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,862 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them