↓ Skip to main content

eChickAtlas: An introduction to the database

Overview of attention for article published in Genesis: The Journal of Genetics and Development, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
eChickAtlas: An introduction to the database
Published in
Genesis: The Journal of Genetics and Development, March 2013
DOI 10.1002/dvg.22374
Pubmed ID
Authors

Frances Wong, Monique C.M. Welten, Claire Anderson, Andrew A. Bain, Jiahui Liu, Michael N. Wicks, Gordana Pavlovska, Megan G. Davey, Paula Murphy, Duncan Davidson, Cheryll A. Tickle, Claudio D. Stern, Richard A. Baldock, David W. Burt

Abstract

The precise control of gene expression is critical in embryonic development. Quantitative assays, such as microarrays and RNA sequencing, provide gene expression levels for a large number of genes, but do not contain spatial information. In contrast, in situ methods, such as in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry, provide spatial resolution, but poor quantification and can only reveal the expression of one, or very few genes at a time. Furthermore, the usual methods of documenting the results, by photographing whole mounts or sections, makes it very difficult to assess the three-dimensional (3D) relationships between expressing and nonexpressing cells. Optical projection tomography (OPT) can capture the full 3D expression pattern in a whole embryo at a reasonable level of resolution and at moderately high throughput. A large database containing spatio-temporal patterns of expression for the mouse (e-Mouse Atlas Project, EMAP, www.emouseatlas.org) has been created, incorporating 3D information. Like the mouse, the chick is an important model in developmental biology and translational studies. To facilitate comparisons between these important model organisms, we have created a 3D anatomical atlas, accompanied by an anatomical ontology of the chick embryo and a database of gene expression patterns during chick development. This database is publicly available (www.echickatlas.org).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
Mexico 1 3%
United States 1 3%
Portugal 1 3%
Unknown 26 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 23%
Professor 3 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 10%
Student > Master 3 10%
Other 5 17%
Unknown 1 3%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 57%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 17%
Computer Science 2 7%
Mathematics 1 3%
Philosophy 1 3%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 2 7%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2013.
All research outputs
#19,975,266
of 25,411,814 outputs
Outputs from Genesis: The Journal of Genetics and Development
#734
of 919 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#156,285
of 212,246 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genesis: The Journal of Genetics and Development
#7
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,411,814 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 919 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,246 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.