You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Niraparib Maintenance Therapy in Platinum-Sensitive, Recurrent Ovarian Cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
New England Journal of Medicine, October 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1056/nejmoa1611310 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mansoor R Mirza, Bradley J Monk, Jørn Herrstedt, Amit M Oza, Sven Mahner, Andrés Redondo, Michel Fabbro, Jonathan A Ledermann, Domenica Lorusso, Ignace Vergote, Noa E Ben-Baruch, Christian Marth, Radosław Mądry, René D Christensen, Jonathan S Berek, Anne Dørum, Anna V Tinker, Andreas du Bois, Antonio González-Martín, Philippe Follana, Benedict Benigno, Per Rosenberg, Lucy Gilbert, Bobbie J Rimel, Joseph Buscema, John P Balser, Shefali Agarwal, Ursula A Matulonis |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 164 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 48 | 29% |
| Canada | 9 | 5% |
| Spain | 5 | 3% |
| France | 4 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 2% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 4 | 2% |
| Australia | 3 | 2% |
| Colombia | 3 | 2% |
| Denmark | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 17 | 10% |
| Unknown | 64 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 115 | 70% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 24 | 15% |
| Scientists | 21 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,141 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1135 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 165 | 14% |
| Other | 133 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 119 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 94 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 83 | 7% |
| Other | 208 | 18% |
| Unknown | 339 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 420 | 37% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 138 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 56 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 48 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 1% |
| Other | 71 | 6% |
| Unknown | 393 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 385. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2024.
All research outputs
#81,743
of 25,773,273 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#2,244
of 32,675 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,760
of 328,952 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#66
of 311 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,773,273 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,675 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 122.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,952 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 311 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.