↓ Skip to main content

Factors Affecting Running Economy in Trained Distance Runners

Overview of attention for article published in Sports Medicine, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
35 X users
patent
3 patents
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
620 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1262 Mendeley
Title
Factors Affecting Running Economy in Trained Distance Runners
Published in
Sports Medicine, September 2012
DOI 10.2165/00007256-200434070-00005
Pubmed ID
Authors

Philo U. Saunders, David B. Pyne, Richard D. Telford, John A. Hawley

Abstract

Running economy (RE) is typically defined as the energy demand for a given velocity of submaximal running, and is determined by measuring the steady-state consumption of oxygen (VO2) and the respiratory exchange ratio. Taking body mass (BM) into consideration, runners with good RE use less energy and therefore less oxygen than runners with poor RE at the same velocity. There is a strong association between RE and distance running performance, with RE being a better predictor of performance than maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max) in elite runners who have a similar VO2max). RE is traditionally measured by running on a treadmill in standard laboratory conditions, and, although this is not the same as overground running, it gives a good indication of how economical a runner is and how RE changes over time. In order to determine whether changes in RE are real or not, careful standardisation of footwear, time of test and nutritional status are required to limit typical error of measurement. Under controlled conditions, RE is a stable test capable of detecting relatively small changes elicited by training or other interventions. When tracking RE between or within groups it is important to account for BM. As VO2 during submaximal exercise does not, in general, increase linearly with BM, reporting RE with respect to the 0.75 power of BM has been recommended. A number of physiological and biomechanical factors appear to influence RE in highly trained or elite runners. These include metabolic adaptations within the muscle such as increased mitochondria and oxidative enzymes, the ability of the muscles to store and release elastic energy by increasing the stiffness of the muscles, and more efficient mechanics leading to less energy wasted on braking forces and excessive vertical oscillation. Interventions to improve RE are constantly sought after by athletes, coaches and sport scientists. Two interventions that have received recent widespread attention are strength training and altitude training. Strength training allows the muscles to utilise more elastic energy and reduce the amount of energy wasted in braking forces. Altitude exposure enhances discrete metabolic aspects of skeletal muscle, which facilitate more efficient use of oxygen. The importance of RE to successful distance running is well established, and future research should focus on identifying methods to improve RE. Interventions that are easily incorporated into an athlete's training are desirable.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,262 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 6 <1%
United States 5 <1%
Brazil 5 <1%
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Germany 4 <1%
South Africa 4 <1%
Denmark 3 <1%
France 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Other 9 <1%
Unknown 1218 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 256 20%
Student > Master 236 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 150 12%
Researcher 75 6%
Student > Postgraduate 72 6%
Other 199 16%
Unknown 274 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 588 47%
Medicine and Dentistry 109 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 62 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 52 4%
Engineering 41 3%
Other 100 8%
Unknown 310 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 84. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 June 2023.
All research outputs
#504,923
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Sports Medicine
#486
of 2,875 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,548
of 187,107 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sports Medicine
#43
of 574 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,875 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 56.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 187,107 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 574 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.