| Title |
Bullying Prevention: a Summary of the Report of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Prevention Science, October 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11121-016-0722-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daniel J. Flannery, Jonathan Todres, Catherine P. Bradshaw, Angela Frederick Amar, Sandra Graham, Mark Hatzenbuehler, Matthew Masiello, Megan Moreno, Regina Sullivan, Tracy Vaillancourt, Suzanne M. Le Menestrel, Frederick Rivara |
| Abstract |
Long tolerated as a rite of passage into adulthood, bullying is now recognized as a major and preventable public health problem. The consequences of bullying-for those who are bullied, the perpetrators of bullying, and the witnesses-include poor physical health, anxiety, depression, increased risk for suicide, poor school performance, and future delinquent and aggressive behavior. Despite ongoing efforts to address bullying at the law, policy, and programmatic levels, there is still much to learn about the consequences of bullying and the effectiveness of various responses. In 2016, the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine published a report entitled Preventing Bullying Through Science, Policy and Practice, which examined the evidence on bullying, its impact, and responses to date. This article summarizes the report's key findings and recommendations related to bullying prevention. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 60% |
| Turkey | 1 | 10% |
| Spain | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 2 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 90% |
| Scientists | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 124 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 16 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 9% |
| Researcher | 10 | 8% |
| Other | 20 | 16% |
| Unknown | 39 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 31 | 25% |
| Social Sciences | 14 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 8% |
| Neuroscience | 6 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 14 | 11% |
| Unknown | 44 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2018.
All research outputs
#5,021,048
of 25,066,230 outputs
Outputs from Prevention Science
#336
of 1,127 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,073
of 328,224 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Prevention Science
#9
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,066,230 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,127 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,224 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.