↓ Skip to main content

Electrode Performance of S-doped Vanadium Pentoxide as Cathode Active Material for Rechargeable Magnesium Battery

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of The Surface Finishing Society of Japan, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#10 of 158)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Electrode Performance of S-doped Vanadium Pentoxide as Cathode Active Material for Rechargeable Magnesium Battery
Published in
Journal of The Surface Finishing Society of Japan, January 2011
DOI 10.4139/sfj.62.516
Authors

Masashi INAMOTO, Hideki KURIHARA, Tatsuhiko YAJIMA

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 December 2016.
All research outputs
#6,432,313
of 25,059,640 outputs
Outputs from Journal of The Surface Finishing Society of Japan
#10
of 158 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,201
of 193,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of The Surface Finishing Society of Japan
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,059,640 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 158 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,034 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.