↓ Skip to main content

Determination of the connectivity of newborn neurons in mammalian olfactory circuits

Overview of attention for article published in Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
Title
Determination of the connectivity of newborn neurons in mammalian olfactory circuits
Published in
Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, September 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00018-016-2367-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Namasivayam Ravi, Luis Sanchez-Guardado, Carlos Lois, Wolfgang Kelsch

Abstract

The mammalian olfactory bulb is a forebrain structure just one synapse downstream from the olfactory sensory neurons and performs the complex computations of sensory inputs. The formation of this sensory circuit is shaped through activity-dependent and cell-intrinsic mechanisms. Recent studies have revealed that cell-type specific connectivity and the organization of synapses in dendritic compartments are determined through cell-intrinsic programs already preset in progenitor cells. These progenitor programs give rise to subpopulations within a neuron type that have distinct synaptic organizations. The intrinsically determined formation of distinct synaptic organizations requires factors from contacting cells that match the cell-intrinsic programs. While certain genes control wiring within the newly generated neurons, other regulatory genes provide intercellular signals and are only expressed in neurons that will form contacts with the newly generated cells. Here, the olfactory system has provided a useful model circuit to reveal the factors regulating assembly of the highly structured connectivity in mammals.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 40 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 36%
Researcher 7 17%
Student > Master 7 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 5%
Student > Bachelor 1 2%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 6 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 15 36%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Unknown 8 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2020.
All research outputs
#7,591,533
of 23,794,258 outputs
Outputs from Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
#1,602
of 4,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,914
of 324,977 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
#29
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,794,258 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,151 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,977 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.