You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Activation of the Jasmonic Acid Plant Defence Pathway Alters the Composition of Rhizosphere Bacterial Communities
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, February 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0056457 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lilia C. Carvalhais, Paul G. Dennis, Dayakar V. Badri, Gene W. Tyson, Jorge M. Vivanco, Peer M. Schenk |
| Abstract |
Jasmonic acid (JA) signalling plays a central role in plant defences against necrotrophic pathogens and herbivorous insects, which afflict both roots and shoots. This pathway is also activated following the interaction with beneficial microbes that may lead to induced systemic resistance. Activation of the JA signalling pathway via application of methyl jasmonate (MeJA) alters the composition of carbon containing compounds released by roots, which are implicated as key determinants of rhizosphere microbial community structure. In this study, we investigated the influence of the JA defence signalling pathway activation in Arabidopsis thaliana on the structure of associated rhizosphere bacterial communities using 16S rRNA gene amplicon pyrosequencing. Application of MeJA did not directly influence bulk soil microbial communities but significant changes in rhizosphere community composition were observed upon activation of the jasmonate signalling pathway. Our results suggest that JA signalling may mediate plant-bacteria interactions in the soil upon necrotrophic pathogen and herbivorous insect attacks. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 33% |
| Japan | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 301 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| Mexico | 2 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Nepal | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 288 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 56 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 50 | 17% |
| Researcher | 46 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 21 | 7% |
| Other | 40 | 13% |
| Unknown | 63 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 161 | 53% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 29 | 10% |
| Environmental Science | 13 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 6 | 2% |
| Engineering | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 17 | 6% |
| Unknown | 70 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2020.
All research outputs
#3,586,361
of 22,696,971 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#44,420
of 193,735 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,688
of 287,465 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,017
of 5,158 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,696,971 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,735 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 287,465 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,158 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.