↓ Skip to main content

Large-scale Radiomic Profiling of Recurrent Glioblastoma Identifies an Imaging Predictor for Stratifying Anti-Angiogenic Treatment Response

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Cancer Research, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
233 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
185 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Large-scale Radiomic Profiling of Recurrent Glioblastoma Identifies an Imaging Predictor for Stratifying Anti-Angiogenic Treatment Response
Published in
Clinical Cancer Research, November 2016
DOI 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-16-0702
Pubmed ID
Authors

Philipp Kickingereder, Michael Götz, John Muschelli, Antje Wick, Ulf Neuberger, Russell T. Shinohara, Martin Sill, Martha Nowosielski, Heinz-Peter Schlemmer, Alexander Radbruch, Wolfgang Wick, Martin Bendszus, Klaus H. Maier-Hein, David Bonekamp

Abstract

Antiangiogenic treatment with bevacizumab, a mAb to the VEGF, is the single most widely used therapeutic agent for patients with recurrent glioblastoma. A major challenge is that there are currently no validated biomarkers that can predict treatment outcome. Here we analyze the potential of radiomics, an emerging field of research that aims to utilize the full potential of medical imaging. A total of 4,842 quantitative MRI features were automatically extracted and analyzed from the multiparametric tumor of 172 patients (allocated to a discovery and validation set with a 2:1 ratio) with recurrent glioblastoma prior to bevacizumab treatment. Leveraging a high-throughput approach, radiomic features of patients in the discovery set were subjected to a supervised principal component (superpc) analysis to generate a prediction model for stratifying treatment outcome to antiangiogenic therapy by means of both progression-free and overall survival (PFS and OS). The superpc predictor stratified patients in the discovery set into a low or high risk group for PFS (HR = 1.60; P = 0.017) and OS (HR = 2.14; P < 0.001) and was successfully validated for patients in the validation set (HR = 1.85, P = 0.030 for PFS; HR = 2.60, P = 0.001 for OS). Our radiomic-based superpc signature emerges as a putative imaging biomarker for the identification of patients who may derive the most benefit from antiangiogenic therapy, advances the knowledge in the noninvasive characterization of brain tumors, and stresses the role of radiomics as a novel tool for improving decision support in cancer treatment at low cost. Clin Cancer Res; 1-7. ©2016 AACR.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 185 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 183 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 33 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 9%
Other 15 8%
Student > Master 14 8%
Other 38 21%
Unknown 38 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 63 34%
Computer Science 20 11%
Neuroscience 14 8%
Engineering 11 6%
Physics and Astronomy 9 5%
Other 18 10%
Unknown 50 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 63. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2020.
All research outputs
#671,359
of 25,200,621 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Cancer Research
#405
of 13,194 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,879
of 428,173 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Cancer Research
#6
of 174 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,200,621 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,194 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 428,173 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 174 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.