↓ Skip to main content

High Complication Rate With Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasties on a Fracture Table

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
246 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
168 Mendeley
Title
High Complication Rate With Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasties on a Fracture Table
Published in
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, February 2011
DOI 10.1007/s11999-010-1568-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brian A. Jewett, Dennis K. Collis

Abstract

Recent attention in THA has focused on minimally invasive techniques and their short-term outcomes. Despite much debate over the outcomes and complications of the two-incision and the mini-lateral and mini-posterior approaches, complications arising from use of the anterior THA on a fracture table are not well documented.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 168 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Germany 1 <1%
Ukraine 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 161 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 26 15%
Student > Postgraduate 21 13%
Student > Master 19 11%
Researcher 17 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 10%
Other 23 14%
Unknown 46 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 92 55%
Engineering 5 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 1%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 1%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 <1%
Other 4 2%
Unknown 62 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2015.
All research outputs
#4,836,328
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#1,065
of 7,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,315
of 193,476 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#13
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,298 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,476 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.