You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Implementing international sexual counselling guidelines in hospital cardiac rehabilitation: development of the CHARMS intervention using the Behaviour Change Wheel
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, October 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13012-016-0493-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
J. Mc Sharry, P. J. Murphy, M. Byrne |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 4 | 29% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 29% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 7% |
| Montenegro | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 4 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 57% |
| Scientists | 4 | 29% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 149 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 149 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 28 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 13% |
| Researcher | 14 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 19 | 13% |
| Unknown | 42 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 35 | 23% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 20 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 18 | 12% |
| Unknown | 47 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2022.
All research outputs
#2,366,185
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#474
of 1,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,554
of 329,911 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#8
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,822 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,911 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.