Title |
Epigenetic alteration of p16 and retinoic acid receptor beta genes in the development of epithelial ovarian carcinoma
|
---|---|
Published in |
Tumor Biology, June 2014
|
DOI | 10.1007/s13277-014-2136-1 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Rahul Bhagat, Sandeep Sriram Kumar, Shilpa Vaderhobli, Chennagiri S. Premalata, Venkateshaiah Reddihalli Pallavi, Gawari Ramesh, Lakshmi Krishnamoorthy |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 12 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 25% |
Student > Master | 2 | 17% |
Researcher | 2 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 8% |
Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 8% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 3 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 42% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 17% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 17% |
Unknown | 3 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2016.
All research outputs
#7,489,401
of 22,893,031 outputs
Outputs from Tumor Biology
#413
of 2,624 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,818
of 229,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Tumor Biology
#22
of 108 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,893,031 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,624 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 229,438 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 108 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.