↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
16 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
54 X users
patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
136 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Assessing the causal role of epigenetic clocks in the development of multiple cancers: a Mendelian randomization study
Published in
eLife, March 2022
DOI 10.7554/elife.75374
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fernanda Morales Berstein, Daniel L McCartney, Ake T Lu, Konstantinos K Tsilidis, Emmanouil Bouras, Philip Haycock, Kimberley Burrows, Amanda I Phipps, Daniel D Buchanan, Iona Cheng, Rosalind A Eeles, Christopher A Haiman, Zsofia Kote-Jarai, Fredrick R Schumacher, Sara Benlloch, Ali Amin Al Olama, Kenneth R Muir, Sonja I Berndt, David V Conti, Fredrik Wiklund, Stephen Chanock, Ying Wang, Catherine M Tangen, Jyotsna Batra, Judith A Clements, APCB BioResource, Henrik Grönberg, Nora Pashayan, Johanna Schleutker, Demetrius Albanes, Stephanie Weinstein, Alicja Wolk, Catharine ML West, Lorelei A Mucci, Géraldine Cancel-Tassin, Stella Koutros, Karina Dalsgaard Sørensen, Eli Marie Grindedal, David E Neal, Freddie C Hamdy, Jenny L Donovan, Ruth C Travis, Robert J Hamilton, Sue Ann Ingles, Barry S Rosenstein, Yong-Jie Lu, Graham G Giles, Robert J MacInnis, Adam S Kibel, Ana Vega, Manolis Kogevinas, Kathryn L Penney, Jong Y Park, Janet L Stanford, Cezary Cybulski, Børge G Nordestgaard, Sune F Nielsen, Hermann Brenner, Christiane Maier, UJeri Kim, Esther M John, Manuel R Teixeira, Susan L Neuhausen, Kim De Ruyck, Azad Razack, Lisa F Newcomb, Davor Lessel, Radka Kaneva, Nawaid Usmani, Frank Claessens, Paul A Townsend, Jose Esteban Castelao, Monique J Roobol, Florence Menegaux, Kay-Tee Khaw, ULisa Cannon-Albright, Hardev Pandha, Stephen N Thibodeau, David J Hunter, Peter Kraft, William J Blot, Elio Riboli, Richard M Martin, George Davey Smith, Caroline L Relton, Steve Horvath, Riccardo E Marioni, Tom G Richardson, Rebecca C Richmond

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 54 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 136 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 13%
Researcher 15 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 6%
Professor 8 6%
Student > Bachelor 7 5%
Other 22 16%
Unknown 59 43%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 30 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 1%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 1%
Other 14 10%
Unknown 63 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 154. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2024.
All research outputs
#338,971
of 34,671,148 outputs
Outputs from eLife
#668
of 21,782 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,713
of 472,979 outputs
Outputs of similar age from eLife
#23
of 487 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,671,148 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,782 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 472,979 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 487 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.