Title |
Genetic and Genomic Response to Selection for Food Consumption in Drosophila melanogaster
|
---|---|
Published in |
Behavior Genetics, October 2016
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10519-016-9819-x |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Megan E. Garlapow, Logan J. Everett, Shanshan Zhou, Alexander W. Gearhart, Kairsten A. Fay, Wen Huang, Tatiana V. Morozova, Gunjan H. Arya, Lavanya Turlapati, Genevieve St. Armour, Yasmeen N. Hussain, Sarah E. McAdams, Sophia Fochler, Trudy F. C. Mackay |
Abstract |
Food consumption is an essential component of animal fitness; however, excessive food intake in humans increases risk for many diseases. The roles of neuroendocrine feedback loops, food sensing modalities, and physiological state in regulating food intake are well understood, but not the genetic basis underlying variation in food consumption. Here, we applied ten generations of artificial selection for high and low food consumption in replicate populations of Drosophila melanogaster. The phenotypic response to selection was highly asymmetric, with significant responses only for increased food consumption and minimal correlated responses in body mass and composition. We assessed the molecular correlates of selection responses by DNA and RNA sequencing of the selection lines. The high and low selection lines had variants with significantly divergent allele frequencies within or near 2081 genes and 3526 differentially expressed genes in one or both sexes. A total of 519 genes were both genetically divergent and differentially expressed between the divergent selection lines. We performed functional analyses of the effects of RNAi suppression of gene expression and induced mutations for 27 of these candidate genes that have human orthologs and the strongest statistical support, and confirmed that 25 (93 %) affected the mean and/or variance of food consumption. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 50% |
Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 2 | 50% |
Members of the public | 1 | 25% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 40 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 9 | 23% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 20% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 10% |
Student > Master | 3 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
Other | 5 | 13% |
Unknown | 9 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 40% |
Neuroscience | 3 | 8% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 8% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 5% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
Other | 5 | 13% |
Unknown | 10 | 25% |