↓ Skip to main content

Genetic and Genomic Response to Selection for Food Consumption in Drosophila melanogaster

Overview of attention for article published in Behavior Genetics, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
Title
Genetic and Genomic Response to Selection for Food Consumption in Drosophila melanogaster
Published in
Behavior Genetics, October 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10519-016-9819-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Megan E. Garlapow, Logan J. Everett, Shanshan Zhou, Alexander W. Gearhart, Kairsten A. Fay, Wen Huang, Tatiana V. Morozova, Gunjan H. Arya, Lavanya Turlapati, Genevieve St. Armour, Yasmeen N. Hussain, Sarah E. McAdams, Sophia Fochler, Trudy F. C. Mackay

Abstract

Food consumption is an essential component of animal fitness; however, excessive food intake in humans increases risk for many diseases. The roles of neuroendocrine feedback loops, food sensing modalities, and physiological state in regulating food intake are well understood, but not the genetic basis underlying variation in food consumption. Here, we applied ten generations of artificial selection for high and low food consumption in replicate populations of Drosophila melanogaster. The phenotypic response to selection was highly asymmetric, with significant responses only for increased food consumption and minimal correlated responses in body mass and composition. We assessed the molecular correlates of selection responses by DNA and RNA sequencing of the selection lines. The high and low selection lines had variants with significantly divergent allele frequencies within or near 2081 genes and 3526 differentially expressed genes in one or both sexes. A total of 519 genes were both genetically divergent and differentially expressed between the divergent selection lines. We performed functional analyses of the effects of RNAi suppression of gene expression and induced mutations for 27 of these candidate genes that have human orthologs and the strongest statistical support, and confirmed that 25 (93 %) affected the mean and/or variance of food consumption.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 40 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 20%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Student > Master 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 9 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 40%
Neuroscience 3 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 10 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2017.
All research outputs
#13,990,855
of 22,893,031 outputs
Outputs from Behavior Genetics
#591
of 911 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#176,325
of 319,503 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Behavior Genetics
#9
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,893,031 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 911 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,503 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.