| Title |
Generational Differences in Work Ethic: Fact or Fiction?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Business and Psychology, October 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10869-016-9466-5 |
| Authors |
Keith L. Zabel, Benjamin B. J. Biermeier-Hanson, Boris B. Baltes, Becky J. Early, Agnieszka Shepard |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 147 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 24 | 16% |
| United Kingdom | 22 | 15% |
| Canada | 18 | 12% |
| Spain | 10 | 7% |
| Germany | 4 | 3% |
| Ireland | 3 | 2% |
| Singapore | 2 | 1% |
| Australia | 2 | 1% |
| Belgium | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 17 | 12% |
| Unknown | 43 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 97 | 66% |
| Scientists | 31 | 21% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 13 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 310 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Poland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 308 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 50 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 39 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 28 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 23 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 15 | 5% |
| Other | 47 | 15% |
| Unknown | 108 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Business, Management and Accounting | 70 | 23% |
| Psychology | 50 | 16% |
| Social Sciences | 32 | 10% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 15 | 5% |
| Engineering | 8 | 3% |
| Other | 26 | 8% |
| Unknown | 109 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 867. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2019.
All research outputs
#21,115
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Business and Psychology
#2
of 556 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#353
of 327,969 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Business and Psychology
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 556 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,969 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them