↓ Skip to main content

Immune-Modulating Therapy for Rheumatologic Disease: Implications for Patients with Diabetes

Overview of attention for article published in Current Diabetes Reports, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
Title
Immune-Modulating Therapy for Rheumatologic Disease: Implications for Patients with Diabetes
Published in
Current Diabetes Reports, August 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11892-016-0792-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Scott J. Pilla, Amy Q. Quan, Emily L. Germain-Lee, David B. Hellmann, Nestoras N. Mathioudakis

Abstract

Immune modulators used to treat rheumatologic disease have diverse endocrine effects in patients with diabetes. Providers should be aware of these effects given that diabetes and rheumatologic disease overlap in prevalence and cardiovascular morbidity. In patients with type 1 diabetes, clinical trials have demonstrated that immune modulators used early in the disease can improve pancreatic function, though their efficacy in adults with longstanding autoimmune diabetes is unknown. In patients with type 2 diabetes, hydroxychloroquine is an effective antihyperglycemic and may be preferred for rheumatologic use in patients with difficult glycemic control. In patients without diabetes, hydroxychloroquine and tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors have been found to decrease diabetes incidence in observational studies. Additionally, dapsone and sulfasalazine alter erythrocyte survival resulting in inaccurate HbA1c values. These multifaceted effects of immune modulators create a need for coordinated care between providers treating patients with diabetes to individualize medication selection and prevent hypoglycemic events. More research is needed to determine the long-term outcomes of immune modulators in patients with diabetes.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 56 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 19%
Student > Master 11 19%
Student > Postgraduate 8 14%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 7%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 12 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 47%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 16 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2016.
All research outputs
#4,145,089
of 22,893,031 outputs
Outputs from Current Diabetes Reports
#210
of 1,005 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,879
of 344,217 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Diabetes Reports
#7
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,893,031 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,005 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,217 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.