↓ Skip to main content

Benefit of health education by a training nurse in patients with axial and/or peripheral psoriatic arthritis: A systematic literature review

Overview of attention for article published in Rheumatology International, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
Title
Benefit of health education by a training nurse in patients with axial and/or peripheral psoriatic arthritis: A systematic literature review
Published in
Rheumatology International, August 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00296-016-3549-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

G. Candelas, V. Villaverde, S. García, M. Guerra, M. J. León, J. D. Cañete

Abstract

The aim of this study was to systematically review the literature available about the benefit of health education by a training nurse in patients with axial and/or peripheral psoriatic arthritis in the framework of the drawing up of the axial spondyloarthritis and psoriatic arthritis guidelines of the "Spanish Society of Rheumatology". Electronic databases (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, EMBASE, Medline/PubMed, CINAHL) were systematically searched from inception to 2014 using medical subject headings and keywords. Only articles in English, Spanish and French were included. The patients studied had to be diagnosed of psoriatic arthritis (all ages, both sexes) with axial involvement and/or peripheral arthritis who had received health education by a specialized nurse. We included in the search randomized clinical trials, cohort observational studies, descriptive studies and case series and qualitative research studies. Measured outcomes were those related to the education provided in a nursing consultation such as increased adherence to biological therapy, conducting exercises, smoking cessation and patient satisfaction. Eight studies were included, five randomized clinical trials with moderate level of quality and three intervention studies with no control group with low level of quality. Meta-analyses were not undertaken due to clinical heterogeneity. According to our results, it can be concluded that although there is little evidence on the role of a trained nurse in patients with psoriatic arthritis, this role can be beneficial to the patients because it can increase the rate of adherence to treatment prescribed by a rheumatologist, promotes patient self-management of their disease and increases patient satisfaction.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 89 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 13%
Researcher 12 13%
Student > Master 11 12%
Other 6 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 16 18%
Unknown 27 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 4%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Other 11 12%
Unknown 26 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2019.
All research outputs
#15,387,502
of 22,893,031 outputs
Outputs from Rheumatology International
#1,548
of 2,190 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#219,441
of 343,761 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Rheumatology International
#10
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,893,031 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,190 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,761 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.