↓ Skip to main content

Intermittent Surface Water Connectivity: Fill and Spill Vs. Fill and Merge Dynamics

Overview of attention for article published in Wetlands, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
76 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
Title
Intermittent Surface Water Connectivity: Fill and Spill Vs. Fill and Merge Dynamics
Published in
Wetlands, October 2016
DOI 10.1007/s13157-016-0830-z
Authors

Scott G. Leibowitz, David M. Mushet, Wesley E. Newton

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 1%
Unknown 82 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 16%
Student > Master 12 14%
Student > Bachelor 5 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 21 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 27 33%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 14 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 12%
Engineering 7 8%
Computer Science 1 1%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 22 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2016.
All research outputs
#23,391,126
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Wetlands
#1,212
of 1,431 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#290,668
of 330,733 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Wetlands
#25
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,431 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,733 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.