↓ Skip to main content

ESTIMATING SITE OCCUPANCY, COLONIZATION, AND LOCAL EXTINCTION WHEN A SPECIES IS DETECTED IMPERFECTLY

Overview of attention for article published in Ecology, August 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
1283 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2349 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
ESTIMATING SITE OCCUPANCY, COLONIZATION, AND LOCAL EXTINCTION WHEN A SPECIES IS DETECTED IMPERFECTLY
Published in
Ecology, August 2003
DOI 10.1890/02-3090
Authors

Darryl I. MacKenzie, James D. Nichols, James E. Hines, Melinda G. Knutson, Alan B. Franklin

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2,349 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 62 3%
Brazil 40 2%
India 16 <1%
Spain 10 <1%
Canada 9 <1%
Australia 8 <1%
United Kingdom 8 <1%
France 7 <1%
South Africa 7 <1%
Other 70 3%
Unknown 2112 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 518 22%
Student > Master 477 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 469 20%
Student > Bachelor 170 7%
Other 126 5%
Other 338 14%
Unknown 251 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1297 55%
Environmental Science 575 24%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 44 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 26 1%
Mathematics 17 <1%
Other 67 3%
Unknown 323 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 December 2017.
All research outputs
#4,499,159
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Ecology
#2,081
of 7,181 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,302
of 54,430 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecology
#10
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,181 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 54,430 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.