↓ Skip to main content

The efficacy of fidaxomicin in the treatment of Clostridium difficile infection in a real-world clinical setting: a Spanish multi-centre retrospective cohort

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
Title
The efficacy of fidaxomicin in the treatment of Clostridium difficile infection in a real-world clinical setting: a Spanish multi-centre retrospective cohort
Published in
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, October 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10096-016-2802-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

C. Fehér, E. Múñez Rubio, P. Merino Amador, A. Delgado-Iribarren Garcia-Campero, M. Salavert, E. Merino, E. Maseda Garrido, V. Díaz-Brito, M. J. Álvarez, J. Mensa

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of fidaxomicin in the real-life clinical setting. This was a retrospective cohort of patients with Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) treated with fidaxomicin in 20 Spanish hospitals between July 2013 and July 2014. Clinical cure, 30-day recurrence, 30-day mortality, sustained cure, and factors associated with the failure to achieve sustained cure were analyzed. Of the 72 patients in the cohort 41 (56.9 %) had a fatal underlying disease. There were 44 (61.1 %) recurrent episodes and 26 cases (36.1 %) with a history of multiple recurrences. Most episodes were severe (26, 36 %) or severe-complicated (14, 19.4 %). Clinical cure rate was 90.3 %, recurrence rate was 16.7 % and three patients (4.2 %) died during the follow-up period. Sustained cure was achieved in 52 cases (72.2 %). Adverse events were reported in five cases (6.9 %). Factors associated with the lack of sustained cure were cardiovascular comorbidity (OR 11.4; 95 %CI 1.9-67.8), acute kidney failure (OR 7.4; 95 %CI 1.3-43.1), concomitant systemic antibiotic treatment (OR 6.2; 95 %CI 1.1-36.8), and C-reactive protein value at diagnosis (OR 1.2 for each 1 mg/dl increase; 95 %CI 1.03-1.3). Fidaxomicin is an effective and well tolerable treatment for severe CDI and for cases with elevated recurrence risk.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
Unknown 56 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 9 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 14%
Student > Master 7 12%
Student > Postgraduate 5 9%
Researcher 4 7%
Other 17 30%
Unknown 7 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 42%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Unspecified 3 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 5%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 13 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2017.
All research outputs
#12,967,131
of 22,893,031 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
#1,546
of 2,775 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#160,164
of 320,638 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
#25
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,893,031 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,775 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,638 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.