↓ Skip to main content

Why Did Dr. Tomitaro Makino Possess A Pocket Dictionary of the English and Japanese Language (sic) , First Edition and Secondand Revised Edition ?

Overview of attention for article published in Historical English Studies in Japan, January 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Why Did Dr. Tomitaro Makino Possess A Pocket Dictionary of the English and Japanese Language (sic) , First Edition and Secondand Revised Edition ?
Published in
Historical English Studies in Japan, January 2003
DOI 10.5024/jeigakushi.2004.101
Authors

Tomo-o ENDO

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2024.
All research outputs
#5,333,811
of 25,460,285 outputs
Outputs from Historical English Studies in Japan
#3
of 93 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,528
of 137,037 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Historical English Studies in Japan
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,460,285 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 93 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 137,037 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them