↓ Skip to main content

Lifetime physical activity and the risk of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of neurology, neurosurgery and psychiatry, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
131 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
198 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Lifetime physical activity and the risk of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
Published in
Journal of neurology, neurosurgery and psychiatry, February 2013
DOI 10.1136/jnnp-2012-304724
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mark H B Huisman, Meinie Seelen, Sonja W de Jong, Kirsten R I S Dorresteijn, Perry T C van Doormaal, Anneke J van der Kooi, Marianne de Visser, Helenius Jurgen Schelhaas, Leonard H van den Berg, Jan Herman Veldink

Abstract

It has been hypothesised that physical activity is a risk factor for developing amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), fuelled by observations that professional soccer players and Gulf War veterans are at increased risk. In a population based study, we determined the relation between physical activity and risk of sporadic ALS, using an objective approach for assessing physical activity.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 198 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 196 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 15%
Student > Bachelor 27 14%
Student > Master 25 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 10%
Researcher 18 9%
Other 24 12%
Unknown 55 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 51 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 11%
Neuroscience 18 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 5%
Other 26 13%
Unknown 61 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2016.
All research outputs
#3,062,445
of 25,604,262 outputs
Outputs from Journal of neurology, neurosurgery and psychiatry
#1,693
of 7,423 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,093
of 205,250 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of neurology, neurosurgery and psychiatry
#15
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,604,262 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,423 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,250 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.