| Title |
Microinstabilities associated with a high Mach number, perpendicular bow shock
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Space Science Reviews, January 1984
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00213958 |
| Authors |
C. S. Wu, D. Winske, Y. M. Zhou, S. T. Tsai, P. Rodriguez, M. Tanaka, K. Papadopoulos, K. Akimoto, C. S. Lin, M. M. Leroy, C. C. Goodrich |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 37 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 35% |
| Researcher | 6 | 15% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 10% |
| Professor | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 7 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Physics and Astronomy | 29 | 73% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 3% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Engineering | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 8 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2016.
All research outputs
#4,193,400
of 22,893,031 outputs
Outputs from Space Science Reviews
#266
of 1,087 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,130
of 35,834 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Space Science Reviews
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,893,031 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,087 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 35,834 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them