You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A renewed model of pancreatic cancer evolution based on genomic rearrangement patterns
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, October 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nature19823 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Faiyaz Notta, Michelle Chan-Seng-Yue, Mathieu Lemire, Yilong Li, Gavin W. Wilson, Ashton A. Connor, Robert E. Denroche, Sheng-Ben Liang, Andrew M. K. Brown, Jaeseung C. Kim, Tao Wang, Jared T. Simpson, Timothy Beck, Ayelet Borgida, Nicholas Buchner, Dianne Chadwick, Sara Hafezi-Bakhtiari, John E. Dick, Lawrence Heisler, Michael A. Hollingsworth, Emin Ibrahimov, Gun Ho Jang, Jeremy Johns, Lars G. T. Jorgensen, Calvin Law, Olga Ludkovski, Ilinca Lungu, Karen Ng, Danielle Pasternack, Gloria M. Petersen, Liran I. Shlush, Lee Timms, Ming-Sound Tsao, Julie M. Wilson, Christina K. Yung, George Zogopoulos, John M. S. Bartlett, Ludmil B. Alexandrov, Francisco X. Real, Sean P. Cleary, Michael H. Roehrl, John D. McPherson, Lincoln D. Stein, Thomas J. Hudson, Peter J. Campbell, Steven Gallinger |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 244 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 58 | 24% |
| United Kingdom | 20 | 8% |
| Canada | 11 | 5% |
| Australia | 10 | 4% |
| Spain | 9 | 4% |
| France | 8 | 3% |
| India | 5 | 2% |
| Mexico | 5 | 2% |
| Japan | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 18 | 7% |
| Unknown | 98 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 138 | 57% |
| Scientists | 91 | 37% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 13 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 707 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 9 | 1% |
| United States | 8 | 1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 680 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 161 | 23% |
| Researcher | 147 | 21% |
| Student > Bachelor | 70 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 57 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 46 | 7% |
| Other | 117 | 17% |
| Unknown | 109 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 235 | 33% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 133 | 19% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 123 | 17% |
| Computer Science | 15 | 2% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 11 | 2% |
| Other | 58 | 8% |
| Unknown | 132 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 704. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2022.
All research outputs
#29,704
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#2,749
of 98,779 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#539
of 328,974 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#57
of 1,022 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,779 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,974 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,022 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.