| Title |
Early acid–base and blood pressure effects of continuous renal replacement therapy intensity in patients with metabolic acidosis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00134-012-2800-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rinaldo Bellomo, Miklos Lipcsey, Paolo Calzavacca, Michael Haase, Anjia Haase-Fielitz, Elisa Licari, Augustine Tee, Louise Cole, Alan Cass, Simon Finfer, Martin Gallagher, Joanne Lee, Serigne Lo, Colin McArthur, Shay McGuinness, John Myburgh, Carlos Scheinkestel, The RENAL Study Investigators and The ANZICS Clinical Trials Group |
| Abstract |
In acute kidney injury patients, metabolic acidosis is common. Its severity, duration, and associated changes in mean arterial pressure (MAP) and vasopressor therapy may be affected by the intensity of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). We aimed to compare key aspects of acidosis and MAP and vasopressor therapy in patients treated with two different CRRT intensities. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 2 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Belgium | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 71 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 12 | 16% |
| Researcher | 12 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 11% |
| Professor | 6 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 17 | 22% |
| Unknown | 15 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 47 | 62% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 1% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 20 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2013.
All research outputs
#15,265,264
of 22,699,621 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#3,993
of 4,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#182,575
of 282,302 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#37
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,699,621 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,968 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.6. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,302 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.