↓ Skip to main content

Efficacy and safety of single fecal microbiota transplantation for Japanese patients with mild to moderately active ulcerative colitis

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Gastroenterology, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
73 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
Title
Efficacy and safety of single fecal microbiota transplantation for Japanese patients with mild to moderately active ulcerative colitis
Published in
Journal of Gastroenterology, October 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00535-016-1271-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Atsushi Nishida, Hirotsugu Imaeda, Masashi Ohno, Osamu Inatomi, Shigeki Bamba, Mitsushige Sugimoto, Akira Andoh

Abstract

The clinical utility of fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) is still controversial. We investigated the efficacy and safety of single FMT for patients with mild to moderately active UC in a Japanese population. Fifty-seven patients were evaluated for eligibility, and 16 patients were excluded. Forty-one patients with UC refractory to standard medical therapy were treated with single FMT by colonoscopic administration. Changes in the fecal microbiota were assessed by 16S ribosomal DNA based terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis. At 8 weeks after FMT, no patient achieved clinical remission, and 11 of 41 patients (26.8 %) showed clinical response. The full Mayo score and the Mayo clinical score significantly decreased at week 8 [full Mayo score 5.5 ± 2.4 (mean ± standard deviation) at initiation and 4.6 ± 2.2 at week 8, P < 0.004; Mayo clinical score 4.0 ± 2.0 at initiation and 3.0 ± 1.9 at week 8, P < 0.001], but there were no statistically significant effects on the Mayo endoscopic score. No adverse events occurred after FMT or during the follow-up period of 8 weeks. The proportion of Bifidobacterium was significantly higher in the donor feces used for responders than in the donor feces used for nonresponders. The proportion of Lactobacillales and Clostridium cluster IV were significantly higher in the donor feces used for nonresponders. Single FMT by colonoscopy was performed safely in all patients, but sufficient clinical efficacy and microbial restoration were not confirmed in patients with mild to moderately active UC.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 1%
Unknown 90 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 21%
Student > Master 12 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 10%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Other 15 16%
Unknown 23 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 35%
Immunology and Microbiology 10 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 31 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2017.
All research outputs
#18,475,157
of 22,893,031 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Gastroenterology
#849
of 1,092 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#242,200
of 320,020 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Gastroenterology
#14
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,893,031 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,092 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,020 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.