↓ Skip to main content

Promoting regulation via the inhibition of DNAM-1 after transplantation

Overview of attention for article published in Blood, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Promoting regulation via the inhibition of DNAM-1 after transplantation
Published in
Blood, February 2013
DOI 10.1182/blood-2012-07-444026
Pubmed ID
Authors

Motoko Koyama, Rachel D. Kuns, Stuart D. Olver, Katie E. Lineburg, Mary Lor, Bianca E. Teal, Neil C. Raffelt, Lucie Leveque, Christopher J. Chan, Renee J. Robb, Kate A. Markey, Kylie A. Alexander, Antiopi Varelias, Andrew D. Clouston, Mark J. Smyth, Kelli P.A. MacDonald, Geoffrey R. Hill

Abstract

Donor T cells play pivotal roles in graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) effects following bone marrow transplantation (BMT). DNAX accessory molecule 1 (DNAM-1) is a costimulatory and adhesion molecule, expressed mainly by natural killer cells and CD8(+) T cells at steady state to promote adhesion to ligand-expressing targets and enhance cytolysis. We have analyzed the role of this pathway in GVHD and GVL. The absence of DNAM-1 on the donor graft attenuated GVHD in major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-mismatched and MHC-matched BMT following conditioning with lethal and sublethal irradiation. In contrast, DNAM-1 was not critical for GVL effects against ligand (CD155) expressing and nonexpressing leukemia. The effects on GVHD following myeloablative conditioning were independent of CD8(+) T cells and dependent on CD4(+) T cells, and specifically donor FoxP3(+) regulatory T cells (Treg). The absence of DNAM-1 promoted the expansion and suppressive function of Treg after BMT. These findings provide support for therapeutic DNAM-1 inhibition to promote tolerance in relevant inflammatory-based diseases characterized by T-cell activation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 2%
Australia 1 2%
Unknown 54 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 32%
Other 6 11%
Researcher 6 11%
Student > Postgraduate 5 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 7%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 9 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 29%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 14%
Engineering 2 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 8 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2013.
All research outputs
#19,945,185
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Blood
#29,160
of 33,238 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#151,663
of 204,956 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Blood
#217
of 309 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,238 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 204,956 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 309 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.