↓ Skip to main content

Inequality in developing economies: the role of institutional development

Overview of attention for article published in Public Choice, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
Title
Inequality in developing economies: the role of institutional development
Published in
Public Choice, August 2011
DOI 10.1007/s11127-011-9838-3
Authors

Adalgiso Amendola, Joshy Easaw, Antonio Savoia

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 85 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 26%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 10%
Student > Master 8 9%
Student > Postgraduate 6 7%
Other 5 6%
Other 16 18%
Unknown 21 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 37 42%
Social Sciences 16 18%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 3%
Arts and Humanities 2 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 24 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2019.
All research outputs
#3,552,413
of 25,425,223 outputs
Outputs from Public Choice
#265
of 1,375 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,730
of 130,560 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Public Choice
#4
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,425,223 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,375 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 130,560 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.