| Title |
Ethical issues in biomedical research: Perceptions and practices of postdoctoral research fellows responding to a survey
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science and Engineering Ethics, March 1996
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf02639320 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Susan Eastwood, Pamela Derish, Evangeline Leash, Stephen Ordway |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 2% |
| South Africa | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 50 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 11 | 21% |
| Researcher | 9 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 13% |
| Unknown | 10 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 12% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 5 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 15 | 29% |
| Unknown | 11 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 October 2017.
All research outputs
#3,693,934
of 25,388,837 outputs
Outputs from Science and Engineering Ethics
#280
of 966 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,780
of 26,279 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science and Engineering Ethics
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,388,837 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 966 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 26,279 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them