| Title |
An expert-assisted citizen science program involving agricultural high schools provides national patterns on bee species assemblages
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Insect Conservation, October 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10841-016-9927-1 |
| Authors |
Violette Le Féon, Mickaël Henry, Laurent Guilbaud, Clémentine Coiffait-Gombault, Eric Dufrêne, Emilie Kolodziejczyk, Michael Kuhlmann, Fabrice Requier, Bernard E. Vaissière |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 27% |
| Canada | 2 | 18% |
| France | 1 | 9% |
| United States | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 4 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 55% |
| Scientists | 4 | 36% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 89 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 19% |
| Researcher | 13 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 9% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 10 | 11% |
| Unknown | 19 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 40 | 44% |
| Environmental Science | 16 | 18% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 26 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2021.
All research outputs
#3,427,729
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Insect Conservation
#122
of 797 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,713
of 330,733 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Insect Conservation
#4
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 797 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,733 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.