| Title |
Tibial Tubercle Osteotomy or Quadriceps Snip in Two‐stage Revision for Prosthetic Knee Infection? A Randomized Prospective Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11999-012-2763-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Danilo Bruni, Francesco Iacono, Bharat Sharma, Stefano Zaffagnini, Maurilio Marcacci |
| Abstract |
Although 7% to 38% of revision total knee arthroplasties (RTKAs) are attributable to prosthetic knee infections, controversy exists regarding the best surgical approach while reducing the risk of extensor mechanism complications and the reinfection rate. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 80 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 11 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 11% |
| Researcher | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 15 | 18% |
| Unknown | 23 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 42 | 51% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Psychology | 1 | 1% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 27 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2013.
All research outputs
#19,944,994
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#5,962
of 7,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#221,270
of 289,019 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#106
of 158 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,298 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,019 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 158 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.