↓ Skip to main content

Flowering time and elevated atmospheric CO2

Overview of attention for article published in New Phytologist, August 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
145 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
191 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Flowering time and elevated atmospheric CO2
Published in
New Phytologist, August 2007
DOI 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02196.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Clint J Springer, Joy K Ward

Abstract

Flowering is a critical milestone in the life cycle of plants, and changes in the timing of flowering may alter processes at the species, community and ecosystem levels. Therefore understanding flowering-time responses to global change drivers, such as elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations, [CO(2)], is necessary to predict the impacts of global change on natural and agricultural ecosystems. Here we summarize the results of 60 studies reporting flowering-time responses (defined as the time to first visible flower) of both crop and wild species at elevated [CO(2)]. These studies suggest that elevated [CO(2)] will influence flowering time in the future. In addition, interactions between elevated [CO(2)] and other global change factors may further complicate our ability to predict changes in flowering time. One approach to overcoming this problem is to elucidate the primary mechanisms that control flowering-time responses to elevated [CO(2)]. Unfortunately, the mechanisms controlling these responses are not known. However, past work has indicated that carbon metabolism exerts partial control on flowering time, and therefore may be involved in elevated [CO(2)]-induced changes in flowering time. This review also indicates the need for more studies addressing the effects of global change drivers on developmental processes in plants.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 191 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 4%
Australia 3 2%
France 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Taiwan 1 <1%
Philippines 1 <1%
Serbia 1 <1%
Unknown 175 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 49 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 18%
Student > Master 22 12%
Student > Bachelor 16 8%
Professor 14 7%
Other 32 17%
Unknown 24 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 103 54%
Environmental Science 31 16%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 14 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 3%
Engineering 2 1%
Other 5 3%
Unknown 30 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2015.
All research outputs
#18,331,227
of 22,699,621 outputs
Outputs from New Phytologist
#8,044
of 8,536 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,826
of 67,740 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New Phytologist
#20
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,699,621 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,536 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.6. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 67,740 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.