You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comment on “Modern‐age buildup of CO2 and its effects on seawater acidity and salinity” by Hugo A. Loáiciga
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Geophysical Research Letters, September 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1029/2006gl027288 |
| Authors |
Ken Caldeira, David Archer, James P. Barry, Richard G. J. Bellerby, Peter G. Brewer, Long Cao, Andrew G. Dickson, Scott C. Doney, Harry Elderfield, Victoria J. Fabry, Richard A. Feely, Jean‐Pierre Gattuso, Peter M. Haugan, Ove Hoegh‐Guldberg, Atul K. Jain, Joan A. Kleypas, Chris Langdon, James C. Orr, Andy Ridgwell, Christopher L. Sabine, Brad A. Seibel, Yoshihisa Shirayama, Carol Turley, Andrew J. Watson, Richard E. Zeebe |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 155 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 5% |
| Germany | 2 | 1% |
| France | 2 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Costa Rica | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Iceland | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 137 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 54 | 35% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 23 | 15% |
| Unknown | 14 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 48 | 31% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 45 | 29% |
| Environmental Science | 27 | 17% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 7% |
| Unknown | 17 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2013.
All research outputs
#6,518,670
of 24,717,821 outputs
Outputs from Geophysical Research Letters
#8,679
of 20,833 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,224
of 76,808 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geophysical Research Letters
#54
of 107 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,717,821 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,833 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 76,808 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 107 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.