↓ Skip to main content

方法二元論をめぐる最近の規範論理学的議論

Overview of attention for article published in The Annals of Legal Philosophy, October 1972
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
方法二元論をめぐる最近の規範論理学的議論
Published in
The Annals of Legal Philosophy, October 1972
DOI 10.11205/jalp1953.1971.93
Authors

守屋 正通

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2022.
All research outputs
#7,051,839
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from The Annals of Legal Philosophy
#3
of 64 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#730
of 3,417 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Annals of Legal Philosophy
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 64 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 3,417 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them