↓ Skip to main content

Symmetry is in the eye of the ‘beeholder’: innate preference for bilateral symmetry in flower-naïve bumblebees

Overview of attention for article published in The Science of Nature, June 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
97 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
164 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Symmetry is in the eye of the ‘beeholder’: innate preference for bilateral symmetry in flower-naïve bumblebees
Published in
The Science of Nature, June 2004
DOI 10.1007/s00114-004-0537-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ivana Rodríguez, Andreas Gumbert, Natalie Hempel de Ibarra, Jan Kunze, Martin Giurfa

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 164 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 4 2%
Brazil 4 2%
Mexico 2 1%
Canada 2 1%
United Kingdom 2 1%
United States 2 1%
Spain 2 1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Other 2 1%
Unknown 142 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 32 20%
Student > Bachelor 29 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 16%
Student > Master 21 13%
Professor 12 7%
Other 25 15%
Unknown 18 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 94 57%
Psychology 11 7%
Environmental Science 9 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 4%
Neuroscience 4 2%
Other 16 10%
Unknown 24 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2020.
All research outputs
#16,681,672
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from The Science of Nature
#1,927
of 2,305 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,313
of 61,202 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Science of Nature
#8
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,305 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.1. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 61,202 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.