↓ Skip to main content

Sofosbuvir/Velpatasvir: A Review in Chronic Hepatitis C

Overview of attention for article published in Drugs, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
3 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
Title
Sofosbuvir/Velpatasvir: A Review in Chronic Hepatitis C
Published in
Drugs, October 2016
DOI 10.1007/s40265-016-0648-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarah L. Greig

Abstract

A once-daily, single-tablet, pangenotypic regimen comprising the hepatitis C virus (HCV) NS5B polymerase inhibitor sofosbuvir and the HCV NS5A inhibitor velpatasvir (sofosbuvir/velpatasvir; Epclusa(®)) was recently approved for the treatment of adults with chronic HCV genotype 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 or 6 infection in the USA, EU and Canada. In the phase III ASTRAL trials, once-daily oral sofosbuvir/velpatasvir for 12 weeks provided very high rates of sustained virological response at 12 weeks post treatment (SVR12) in treatment-naive and -experienced patients with chronic HCV genotype 1-6 infection, including those with compensated cirrhosis or HIV-1 co-infection. High SVR12 rates were also observed with sofosbuvir/velpatasvir plus ribavirin for 12 weeks in patients with chronic HCV genotype 1-6 infection and decompensated cirrhosis. Sofosbuvir/velpatasvir was generally well tolerated, with low rates of adverse events. Thus, sofosbuvir/velpatasvir represents a valuable treatment option in adults with chronic HCV genotype 1-6 infection, including those with compensated or decompensated cirrhosis, previous treatment experience or HIV-1 co-infection.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 2%
Unknown 62 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 11 17%
Researcher 8 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 10%
Student > Master 6 10%
Other 4 6%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 20 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 32%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 10%
Chemistry 4 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 23 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2023.
All research outputs
#2,472,904
of 25,398,331 outputs
Outputs from Drugs
#284
of 3,469 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,252
of 326,640 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Drugs
#4
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,398,331 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,469 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,640 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.