↓ Skip to main content

Temperature-dependent sex ratio in a bird

Overview of attention for article published in Biology Letters, March 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
5 blogs
twitter
4 X users
patent
2 patents
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
19 Wikipedia pages
q&a
1 Q&A thread
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
103 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
181 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Temperature-dependent sex ratio in a bird
Published in
Biology Letters, March 2005
DOI 10.1098/rsbl.2004.0247
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ann Gth, David T Booth

Abstract

To our knowledge, there is, so far, no evidence that incubation temperature can affect sex ratios in birds, although this is common in reptiles. Here, we show that incubation temperature does affect sex ratios in megapodes, which are exceptional among birds because they use environmental heat sources for incubation. In the Australian brush-turkey Alectura lathami, a mound-building megapode, more males hatch at low incubation temperatures and more females hatch at high temperatures, whereas the proportion is 1:1 at the average temperature found in natural mounds. Chicks from lower temperatures weigh less, which probably affects offspring survival, but are not smaller. Megapodes possess heteromorphic sex chromosomes like other birds, which eliminates temperature-dependent sex determination, as described for reptiles, as the mechanism behind the skewed sex ratios at high and low temperatures. Instead, our data suggest a sex-biased temperature-sensitive embryo mortality because mortality was greater at the lower and higher temperatures, and minimal at the middle temperature where the sex ratio was 1:1.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 181 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Romania 1 <1%
Other 2 1%
Unknown 168 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 47 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 22%
Student > Master 24 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 12 7%
Student > Bachelor 10 6%
Other 25 14%
Unknown 24 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 111 61%
Environmental Science 14 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 3%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 1%
Other 11 6%
Unknown 31 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 50. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2023.
All research outputs
#774,146
of 24,080,653 outputs
Outputs from Biology Letters
#814
of 3,324 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#852
of 61,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biology Letters
#1
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,080,653 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,324 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 58.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 61,090 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.