↓ Skip to main content

Is Depression an Inflammatory Disorder?

Overview of attention for article published in Current Psychiatry Reports, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
10 news outlets
twitter
23 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user
reddit
1 Redditor
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
439 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
576 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Is Depression an Inflammatory Disorder?
Published in
Current Psychiatry Reports, September 2011
DOI 10.1007/s11920-011-0232-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Charles L. Raison, Andrew H. Miller

Abstract

Studies consistently report that groups of individuals with major depressive disorder (MDD) demonstrate increased levels of a variety of peripheral inflammatory biomarkers when compared with groups of nondepressed individuals. These findings are often interpreted as meaning that MDD, even in medically healthy individuals, may be an inflammatory condition. In this article, we examine evidence for and against this idea by looking more closely into what the actual patterns of inflammatory findings indicate in terms of the relationship between MDD and the immune system. Data are presented in support of the idea that inflammation only contributes to depression in a subset of patients versus the possibility that the depressogenic effect of inflammatory activation is more widespread and varies depending on the degree of vulnerability any given individual evinces in interconnected physiologic systems known to be implicated in the etiology of MDD. Finally, the treatment implications of these various possibilities are discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 576 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 <1%
United States 3 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Hungary 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 559 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 99 17%
Student > Bachelor 91 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 85 15%
Researcher 70 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 40 7%
Other 99 17%
Unknown 92 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 122 21%
Psychology 99 17%
Neuroscience 57 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 55 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 26 5%
Other 89 15%
Unknown 128 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 111. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2022.
All research outputs
#368,770
of 25,013,816 outputs
Outputs from Current Psychiatry Reports
#56
of 1,267 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,285
of 134,993 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Psychiatry Reports
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,013,816 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,267 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 134,993 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.