↓ Skip to main content

Habitat choice, recruitment and the response of coral reef fishes to coral degradation

Overview of attention for article published in Oecologia, June 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs

Citations

dimensions_citation
127 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
394 Mendeley
Title
Habitat choice, recruitment and the response of coral reef fishes to coral degradation
Published in
Oecologia, June 2007
DOI 10.1007/s00442-007-0773-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

David A. Feary, Glenn R. Almany, Mark I. McCormick, Geoffrey P. Jones

Abstract

The global degradation of coral reefs is having profound effects on the structure and species richness of associated reef fish assemblages. Historically, variation in the composition of fish communities has largely been attributed to factors affecting settlement of reef fish larvae. However, the mechanisms that determine how fish settlers respond to different stages of coral stress and the extent of coral loss on fish settlement are poorly understood. Here, we examined the effects of habitat degradation on fish settlement using a two-stage experimental approach. First, we employed laboratory choice experiments to test how settlers responded to early and terminal stages of coral degradation. We then quantified the settlement response of the whole reef fish assemblage in a field perturbation experiment. The laboratory choice experiments tested how juveniles from nine common Indo-Pacific fishes chose among live colonies, partially degraded colonies, and dead colonies with recent algal growth. Many species did not distinguish between live and partially degraded colonies, suggesting settlement patterns are resilient to the early stages of declining coral health. Several species preferred live or degraded corals, and none preferred to associate with dead, algal-covered colonies. In the field experiment, fish recruitment to coral colonies was monitored before and after the introduction of a coral predator (the crown-of-thorns starfish) and compared with undisturbed control colonies. Starfish reduced live coral cover by 95-100%, causing persistent negative effects on the recruitment of coral-associated fishes. Rapid reductions in new recruit abundance, greater numbers of unoccupied colonies and a shift in the recruit community structure from one dominated by coral-associated fishes before degradation to one predominantly composed of algal-associated fish species were observed. Our results suggest that while resistant to coral stress, coral death alters the process of replenishment of coral reef fish communities.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 394 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 1%
Mexico 4 1%
Australia 3 <1%
Kenya 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Other 7 2%
Unknown 368 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 75 19%
Researcher 73 19%
Student > Master 66 17%
Student > Bachelor 50 13%
Student > Postgraduate 22 6%
Other 56 14%
Unknown 52 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 192 49%
Environmental Science 107 27%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 12 3%
Social Sciences 5 1%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 <1%
Other 17 4%
Unknown 58 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2018.
All research outputs
#1,774,533
of 22,699,621 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#246
of 4,204 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,561
of 70,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#3
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,699,621 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,204 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 70,043 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.