You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Patient-reported experiences and views on the Cytosponge test: a mixed-methods analysis from the BEST3 trial
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMJ Open, April 2022
|
DOI | 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054258 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Roberta Maroni, Jessica Barnes, Judith Offman, Fiona Scheibl, Samuel G Smith, Irene Debiram-Beecham, Jo Waller, Peter Sasieni, Rebecca C Fitzgerald, Greg Rubin, BEST3 Consortium, Fiona M Walter |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 7 | 64% |
Australia | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 3 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 7 | 64% |
Scientists | 3 | 27% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 28 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 5 | 18% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 7% |
Other | 2 | 7% |
Student > Master | 2 | 7% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 7% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 15 | 54% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 21% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 7% |
Psychology | 2 | 7% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 4% |
Computer Science | 1 | 4% |
Other | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 15 | 54% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2022.
All research outputs
#2,553,383
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Open
#4,977
of 25,598 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,265
of 447,652 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Open
#127
of 1,055 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,598 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,652 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,055 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.