Title |
How to diagnose autoimmune pancreatitis by the revised Japanese clinical criteria
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Gastroenterology, May 2007
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00535-007-2049-5 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Kazuichi Okazaki, Kazushige Uchida, Mitsunobu Matsushita, Makoto Takaoka |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Korea, Republic of | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 27 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 6 | 21% |
Researcher | 4 | 14% |
Student > Master | 4 | 14% |
Professor | 3 | 11% |
Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 11% |
Other | 6 | 21% |
Unknown | 2 | 7% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 68% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 4% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 4% |
Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 4% |
Other | 3 | 11% |
Unknown | 2 | 7% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2016.
All research outputs
#7,489,401
of 22,893,031 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Gastroenterology
#299
of 1,092 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,011
of 70,948 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Gastroenterology
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,893,031 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,092 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 70,948 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.