| Title |
Evolutionary history and species delimitations: a case study of the hazel dormouse, Muscardinus avellanarius
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Conservation Genetics, October 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10592-016-0892-8 |
| Authors |
A. Mouton, A. Mortelliti, A. Grill, M. Sara, B. Kryštufek, R. Juškaitis, A. Latinne, G. Amori, E. Randi, S. Büchner, B. Schulz, S. Ehlers, J. Lang, P. Adamik, G. Verbeylen, M. Dorenbosch, R. Trout, M. Elmeros, G. Aloise, S. Mazzoti, F. Matur, F. Poitevin, J. R. Michaux |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 77 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 19 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 15% |
| Unknown | 12 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 38 | 48% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 11% |
| Environmental Science | 8 | 10% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Unknown | 13 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2016.
All research outputs
#17,820,151
of 22,893,031 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Genetics
#918
of 1,047 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#229,073
of 320,638 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Genetics
#14
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,893,031 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,047 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,638 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.