| Title |
Total proximal hamstring ruptures: clinical and MRI aspects including guidelines for postoperative rehabilitation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, December 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00167-012-2311-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Carl M. Askling, George Koulouris, Tönu Saartok, Suzanne Werner, Thomas M. Best |
| Abstract |
The aim of this article is to provide a state-of-the-art review for treatment of acute, total proximal hamstring tendon ruptures. For total proximal hamstring tendon ruptures, early (<2-3 w) surgical refixation minimizes muscle atrophy and facilitates a somewhat predictable time course for healing and rehabilitation. A postoperative rehabilitation program is detailed that has been used by one physical therapist for the past 7 years on over 200 patients with surgical repair for total proximal hamstring tendon rupture. One re-rupture has occurred, 7 months after surgery, following the rehabilitation program described herein. The rehabilitation program, including avoidance of postoperative bracing, appears effective for total proximal hamstring ruptures. Early surgery together with a specific rehabilitation program appears to be the treatment of choice for timely and safe return to sport and an active lifestyle. Level of evidence V. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 40% |
| Canada | 2 | 40% |
| Ireland | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 149 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 146 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 24 | 16% |
| Other | 22 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 15% |
| Researcher | 12 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 7% |
| Other | 25 | 17% |
| Unknown | 33 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 40 | 27% |
| Sports and Recreations | 38 | 26% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 6% |
| Unknown | 40 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2014.
All research outputs
#7,425,026
of 22,699,621 outputs
Outputs from Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
#999
of 2,633 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,836
of 278,754 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
#20
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,699,621 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,633 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,754 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.