You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Age and growth of round gobies in Lake Huron: Implications for food web dynamics
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Great Lakes Research, December 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jglr.2016.08.010 |
| Authors |
You J. Duan, Charles P. Madenjian, Cong X. Xie, James S. Diana, Timothy P. O'Brien, Ying M. Zhao, Ji X. He, Steven A. Farha, Bin Huo |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 26 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 19% |
| Researcher | 3 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 12% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 3 | 12% |
| Unknown | 5 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 11 | 42% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 31% |
| Psychology | 1 | 4% |
| Engineering | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 5 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2016.
All research outputs
#20,346,264
of 22,893,031 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Great Lakes Research
#1,481
of 1,676 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#350,409
of 416,427 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Great Lakes Research
#19
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,893,031 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,676 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 416,427 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.