↓ Skip to main content

Task Experience as a Boundary Condition for the Negative Effects of Irrelevant Information on Learning

Overview of attention for article published in Educational Psychology Review, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
Title
Task Experience as a Boundary Condition for the Negative Effects of Irrelevant Information on Learning
Published in
Educational Psychology Review, October 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10648-016-9388-9
Authors

Gertjan Rop, Margot van Wermeskerken, Jacqueline A. de Nooijer, Peter P. J. L. Verkoeijen, Tamara van Gog

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 48 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 24%
Researcher 7 14%
Lecturer 5 10%
Student > Master 4 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 11 22%
Unknown 7 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 10 20%
Social Sciences 9 18%
Linguistics 5 10%
Unspecified 2 4%
Arts and Humanities 2 4%
Other 9 18%
Unknown 12 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2018.
All research outputs
#3,949,498
of 22,893,031 outputs
Outputs from Educational Psychology Review
#258
of 621 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,224
of 319,861 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Educational Psychology Review
#4
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,893,031 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 621 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,861 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.