↓ Skip to main content

Sensitivity of the avian motion system to light and dark stimuli

Overview of attention for article published in Experimental Brain Research, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
Title
Sensitivity of the avian motion system to light and dark stimuli
Published in
Experimental Brain Research, October 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00221-016-4786-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jean-François Nankoo, Christopher R. Madan, Marcia L. Spetch, Douglas R. Wylie

Abstract

Global motion perception is important for mobile organisms. In laterally eyed birds, global motion appears to be processed in the entopallium, a neural structure that is part of the tectofugal pathway. Electrophysiological research has shown that motion selective cells in the entopallium are most responsive to small dark moving targets. Here, we investigated whether this bias toward dark targets of entopallial cells is mirrored by perceptual performance in a motion detection task in pigeons. We measured the detection thresholds of pigeons using random dot stimuli that consisted of either black or white dots on a gray background. We found that thresholds were significantly lower when using black dots as opposed to white dots. This heightened sensitivity is also noted in the learning rates of the pigeons. That is, we found that the pigeons learned the detection task significantly faster when the stimuli consisted of black dots. We believe that our results have important implications for the understanding of the functional role of the entopallium and the ON and OFF pathways in the avian motion system.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 21%
Professor 3 21%
Other 1 7%
Lecturer 1 7%
Other 2 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 5 36%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 29%
Neuroscience 3 21%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 7%
Computer Science 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2016.
All research outputs
#13,131,140
of 22,893,031 outputs
Outputs from Experimental Brain Research
#1,543
of 3,235 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#162,087
of 319,861 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Experimental Brain Research
#28
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,893,031 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,235 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,861 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.