↓ Skip to main content

Predicting ecosystem stability from community composition and biodiversity

Overview of attention for article published in Ecology Letters, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
13 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
252 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
709 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Predicting ecosystem stability from community composition and biodiversity
Published in
Ecology Letters, February 2013
DOI 10.1111/ele.12088
Pubmed ID
Authors

Claire de Mazancourt, Forest Isbell, Allen Larocque, Frank Berendse, Enrica De Luca, James B. Grace, Bart Haegeman, H. Wayne Polley, Christiane Roscher, Bernhard Schmid, David Tilman, Jasper van Ruijven, Alexandra Weigelt, Brian J. Wilsey, Michel Loreau

Abstract

As biodiversity is declining at an unprecedented rate, an important current scientific challenge is to understand and predict the consequences of biodiversity loss. Here, we develop a theory that predicts the temporal variability of community biomass from the properties of individual component species in monoculture. Our theory shows that biodiversity stabilises ecosystems through three main mechanisms: (1) asynchrony in species' responses to environmental fluctuations, (2) reduced demographic stochasticity due to overyielding in species mixtures and (3) reduced observation error (including spatial and sampling variability). Parameterised with empirical data from four long-term grassland biodiversity experiments, our prediction explained 22-75% of the observed variability, and captured much of the effect of species richness. Richness stabilised communities mainly by increasing community biomass and reducing the strength of demographic stochasticity. Our approach calls for a re-evaluation of the mechanisms explaining the effects of biodiversity on ecosystem stability.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 709 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 7 <1%
Switzerland 6 <1%
United States 6 <1%
Germany 4 <1%
France 3 <1%
Canada 3 <1%
Spain 3 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Finland 2 <1%
Other 14 2%
Unknown 659 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 171 24%
Researcher 145 20%
Student > Master 113 16%
Student > Bachelor 43 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 38 5%
Other 127 18%
Unknown 72 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 312 44%
Environmental Science 219 31%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 25 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 <1%
Other 31 4%
Unknown 106 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2023.
All research outputs
#1,688,263
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Ecology Letters
#963
of 3,186 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,786
of 207,538 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecology Letters
#12
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,186 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,538 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.