You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Caffeine Ingestion and Cycling Power Output in a Low or Normal Muscle Glycogen State
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Medicine and Science in Sports & Exercise, August 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1249/mss.0b013e31828af183 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
STEPHEN C. LANE, JOSE L. ARETA, STEPHEN R. BIRD, VERNON G. COFFEY, LOUISE M. BURKE, BEN DESBROW, LEONIDAS G. KARAGOUNIS, JOHN A. HAWLEY |
| Abstract |
Commencing selected workouts with low muscle glycogen availability augments several markers of training adaptation compared with undertaking the same sessions with normal glycogen content. However, low glycogen availability reduces the capacity to perform high-intensity (>85% of peak aerobic power (VO2 peak)) endurance exercise. We determined whether a low dose of caffeine could partially rescue the reduction in maximal self-selected power output observed when individuals commenced high-intensity interval training with low (LOW) compared with normal (NORM) glycogen availability. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 188 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 38 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 32 | 17% |
| Australia | 19 | 10% |
| Canada | 7 | 4% |
| Spain | 5 | 3% |
| France | 5 | 3% |
| South Africa | 4 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 4 | 2% |
| Belgium | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 18 | 10% |
| Unknown | 52 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 119 | 63% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 36 | 19% |
| Scientists | 28 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 2% |
| Unknown | 2 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 219 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 217 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 50 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 44 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 13 | 6% |
| Researcher | 12 | 5% |
| Other | 33 | 15% |
| Unknown | 41 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 96 | 44% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 5% |
| Other | 20 | 9% |
| Unknown | 45 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 154. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2022.
All research outputs
#269,802
of 25,602,335 outputs
Outputs from Medicine and Science in Sports & Exercise
#227
of 7,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,819
of 210,577 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medicine and Science in Sports & Exercise
#5
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,602,335 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,072 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,577 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.