You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evaluation of the mental health impacts of Universal Credit: protocol for a mixed methods study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMJ Open, April 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061340 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Peter Craig, Benjamin Barr, Andrew J Baxter, Heather Brown, Mandy Cheetham, Marcia Gibson, Srinivasa Vittal Katikireddi, Suzanne Moffatt, Steph Morris, Luke Aaron Munford, Matteo Richiardi, Matt Sutton, David Taylor-Robinson, Sophie Wickham, Huasheng Xiang, Clare Bambra |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 37% |
| Australia | 2 | 11% |
| Chile | 1 | 5% |
| United States | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 8 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 47% |
| Scientists | 7 | 37% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 16% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 19 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 4 | 21% |
| Researcher | 3 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 9 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 4 | 21% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 5% |
| Psychology | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 9 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2024.
All research outputs
#3,100,556
of 25,534,033 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Open
#6,018
of 25,743 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,107
of 449,058 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Open
#165
of 1,031 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,534,033 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,743 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,058 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,031 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.